Welcome to Management Source

Member Login

Lost your password?

Not a member yet? Sign Up!

Archive for the ‘Financial Management’ category

Evolution of Disinvestment Policy (28) Views

Jul 8th
by admin |

It has been decided that Government would disinvest up to 20 per cent of its equity in selected public sector undertakings, in favour of mutual funds and financial or investment institutions in the public sector. The disinvestment, which would broad base the equity, improve management and enhance the availability of resources for these enterprises, is also expected to yield Rs. 2,500 crores to the exchequer in1991-92.

The modalities and details of implementing this decision, which are being worked out, would be announced separately. The policy, as enunciated by the Government, under the Prime Minister Shri Chandrashekhar was to divest up to 20% of the Government equity in selected PSEs in favour of public sector institutional investors. The objective of the policy was stated to be to broad-base equity, improve management, and enhance availability of resources for these PSEs and yield resources for the exchequer.

Problems Associated with Disinvestment:

A number of problems and issues have bedeviled the disinvestment process. The number of bidders for equity has been small not only in the case of financially weak PSUs, but also in that of better-performing PSUs. Besides, the government has often compelled financial institutions, UTI and other mutual funds to purchase the equity which was being unloaded through disinvestment. These organizations have not been very enthusiastic in listing and trading of shares purchased by them as it would reduce their control over PSUs. Instances of insider trading of shares by them have also come to light. All this has led to low valuation or under pricing of equity. Read more…

Disinvestment (27) Views

Jul 8th
by admin |

Twelve years after it was started, the liberalization of the Indian economy remains an ideological and operational battleground. There is mainstream national consensus on the need and irreversibility of reforms, but widespread disagreement about its pace and the sharing of its benefits. A basic aspect of the withdrawal of the state from the economic sphere has been the disinvestment to private parties of the shares (and in some cases control) of public sector enterprises (PSUs) [or state-owned enterprises (SOEs)]. This has affected thousands of Indians, and triggered fierce political debates

Disinvestment, which has now become a universal trend, means transfer of ownership and/management of an enterprise from the public enterprise from an industry or sector to the private sector, partially or fully. Another dimension if disinvestment is opening up of an industry that has been reserved for the public sectors to the private sector.

Disinvestment is an inevitable historical reaction to the indiscriminate expansion of the state sector and the associated problems. Today even in communist countries disinvestments and privatization has become a vital measure of economic rejuvenation.

Disinvestment has its advantages in several ways. It would help reduce the fiscal burden of the state by relieving it of its losses and reducing the size of bureaucracy, enabling the government to mop up funds, better management of the enterprises, encourage entrepreneurship and help accelerate the pace of economic development as it attracts more resources from the private sector for development. It may increase the number of workers and common man who are shareholders and this could make enterprises subject to more public vigilance. Disinvestment also helps the government to concentrate more on the essential state functions. Read more…

Problems with the P/E (28) Views

So far we’ve learned that, in the right circumstances, the P/E ratio can help us determine whether a company is over- or under-valued. But P/E analysis is only valid in certain circumstances and it has its pitfalls. Some factors that can undermine the usefulness of the P/E ratio include: Accounting Earnings is an accounting figure that includes non-cash items. Furthermore, the guidelines for determining earnings are governed by accounting rules (GAAP) that change over time and are different in each country. To complicate matters, EPS can be twisted, prodded and squeezed into various numbers depending on how you do the books. The result is that we often don’t know whether we are comparing the same figures, or apples to oranges. Inflation In times of high inflation, inventory and depreciation costs tend to be understated because the replacement costs of goods and equipment rises with the general level of prices. Thus, P/E ratios tend to be lower during times of high inflation because the market sees earnings as artificially distorted upwards. As with all ratios, it’s more valuable to look at the P/E over time in order to determine the trend. Inflation makes this difficult, as past information is less useful today.

Many Interpretations A low P/E ratio does not necessarily mean that a company is undervalued. Rather, it could mean that the market believes the company is headed for trouble in the near future. Stocks that go down usually do so for a reason. It may be that a company has warned that earnings will come in lower than expected. This wouldn’t be reflected in a trailing P/E ratio until earnings are actually released, during which time the company might look undervalued.

Don’t Buy/Short Just Because of the P/E What goes up … well, sometimes it stays up for an awfully long time. A common mistake among beginning investors is the short selling of stocks because they have a high P/E ratio. If you aren’t familiar with short selling, it’s an investing technique by which an investor can make money when a shorted security falls in value. First of all, we believe that novice investors shouldn’t be shorting. Secondly, you can get into a lot of trouble by valuing stocks using only simple indicators such as the P/E ratio. Although a high P/E ratio could mean that a stock is overvalued, there is no guarantee that it will come back down anytime soon. On the flipside, even if a stock is undervalued, it could take years for the market to value it in the proper way. Security analysis requires a great deal more than understanding a few ratios. While the P/E is one part of the puzzle, it’s definitely not a crystal ball.

Conclusion

What have we learned about the P/E ratio? Although the P/E often doesn’t tell us much, it can be useful to compare the P/E of one company to another in the same industry, to the market in general, or to the company’s own historical P/E ratios.

Some points to remember:

  • The P/E ratio is the current stock price of a company divided by its earnings per share (EPS).
  • Variations exist using trailing EPS, forward EPS, or an average of the two.
  • Historically, the average P/E ratio in the market has been around 15-25.
  • Theoretically, a stock’s P/E tells us how much investors are willing to pay per dollar of earnings.
  • A better interpretation of the P/E ratio is to see it as a reflection of the market’s optimism concerning a firm’s growth prospects.
  • The P/E ratio is a much better indicator of a stock’s value than the market price alone.
  • In general, it’s difficult to say whether a particular P/E is high or low without taking into account growth rates and the industry.
  • Changes in accounting rules as well as differing EPS calculations can make analysis difficult.
  • P/E ratios are generally lower during times of high inflation.
  • There are many explanations as to why a company has a low P/E.
  • Don’t base any buy or sell decision on the multiple alone.

Measurement of Cost of Capital (46) Views

Jun 18th
by admin |

Cost of Debt: The debts may be either short term debts or long term debts. Very naturally, the cost of capital in the form of debt is the interest which the company has to pay. But this is not the real cost attached with debt capital. The real cost is something less than the rate of interest which the company has to pay. This is due to the fact that the interest on debt is a tax deductible expenditure. If the amount of interest is considered as a part of expenses, the tax liability of the company reduces proportionately. As such, while computing the cost of debt, adjustments are required to be made for its tax impact. E.g. suppose a company issues the debentures having face value ofRs.1 00 and bearing the rate of interest of 10% p.a. If the tax rate applicable to the company is 50%, the cost of debentures is not] 0% which is the rate of interest, but it is to be duly reduced by the tax benefits available due to this interest. Tax benefit is 50% of 10%, hence the cost of debentures is only 5%. Further, the interest payable on the debentures has to be viewed from the angle of the amount actually received on their issue. E.g. A company issues] 000 debentures of Rs.100, each bearing interest @8% p.a. Company incurs the expenses in connection with the issue of debentures to the extent of Rs.10,000 (These expenses may be in the form of discount allowed, underwriting commission, advertisement etc.) Thus, the company will have to pay the annual interest ofRs.8,000 on the net amount received to the extent of only Rs.90,000 (i.e. Rs.1,OO,OOO minus Rs.10,000). Cost of debentures in this case works out to around 8.89% and assuming that the tax rate applicable is 50%, the tax benefit makes the cost of debentures equal to 4.45%. However, the debt capital has a hidden cost also. If the debt content in the capital structure of a company exceeds the optimum level, the investors start considering company as too risky and their expectations from equity shares increase. This is the hidden cost of debt.

Cost of Preference Shares: The cost of capital preference shares is the dividend rate payable on them. As in case of debentures, the cost of capital is adjusted for the amount excess or less received on the issue of preference shares. E.g. Suppose, a company issues 1,000 preference shares of Rs.100 each at the value of Rs.105 each. Rate of dividend is 10% and the expenses involved with the issue of preference shares amount to Rs10,000. Thus the net amount received works out to Rs.95,000 whereas the amount of the dividend is Rs.10,000. Here, the cost of capital works out to.

(Rs.10000/Rs.95000)*100=10.52%

As the amount of dividend payable on preference shares is not a tax deductible Expenditure, there is no question of further adjustment for tax benefit. Read more…

Importance of Cost of Capital (36) Views

Jun 18th
by admin |

The term cost of capital is important for a company basically for following purposes:

(1) The concept of cost of capital is used as a tool for screening the investment proposals.(The various methods for appraising investment purposes are discussed in details in the following chapters). E.g. In case of the net present value method, the cost of capital is used as the discounting rate for discounting the future inflow of funds. Any project resulting into positive net present value only will be accepted. All other projects will be rejected. Similarly, in case of Internal Rate of Return Method (IRR), the resultant IRR is compared with the cost of capital. It is expected, that if a project is to be accepted, IRR resulting tram the same should be more than cost of capital. If project generates IRR which is less than cost of capital, the project will be rejected.

(2) The cost of capital is used as the capitalization rate to decide the amount of capitalization in case of a new concern.

(3) The concept of cost of capital provides useful guidelines for determining the optimal capital structure. Optimal capital structure is the one where overall cost of capital is minimum and the overall valuation of the firm is maximum.

Cost of Capital (46) Views

Jun 18th
by admin |

Introduction:

In the previous chapter, we discussed about the various sources from which the long term requirements of the capital can be met. Each of these sources involves some cost. The cost of capital can be defined as “the rate of which an organization must pay to the suppliers of capital for the use of their funds”.

In economic term, the cost of capital is viewed from two different angles.

(1) The cost of raising funds to finance a project. This cost may be in the form of the interest which the company may be required to pay to the suppliers of funds. This may be the explicit cost attached with the various sources of capital.

(2) The cost of capital may be in the form of opportunity cost of the funds of company i.e. rate of return which the company would have earned if the funds are not invested. Eg. suppose that a company has an amount ofRs.100.000 which may either be utilized for purchasing a machine or may be invested with a bank as fixed deposit carrying the interest 10%p.a. If the company decides to use the amount for purchasing the machine, obviously it will have to forgo the interest which it would have earned by investing the same in fixed deposit with the bank. Thus, the cost of capital of the capital of Rs.1,00,000 is 10%.

Concepts of Cost of Capital:

Besides the general concept of cost of capital, the following concepts are also used frequently.

Component Cost and Composite Cost

Component cost refers to the cost of individual components of capital viz. equity shares, preference shares, debentures and so on. Composite cost of capital refers to the combined or weighted average cost of capital of the various individual components. For capital budgeting decisions, it is the composite cost of capital which is considered.

Average Cost and Marginal Cost:

The average cost refers to the weighted average cost of capital. Marginal cost refers to the incremental cost attached with new funds raised by the company.

Explicit Cost and Implicit Cost:

Explicit cost is the one which is attached with the source of capital explicitly or apparently. Implicit cost is the hidden cost which is not incurred directly. Eg. In case of the debt capital, the interest which the company is required to pay on the same is explicit cost of capital. However, if the company introduces more and more doses of debt capital in the overall capital structure, it makes the investment in the company a risky proposition. As such, the expectations of the investors in terms of return on their investment may increase and share prices of the company may decrease. These increased expectations of the investors or the decreased share prices may be considered to be implicit cost of debt capital.

Factors affecting Capital Structure (76) Views

Jun 18th
by admin |

Before deciding the mix of long term sources of funds, it is necessary to consider a lot of factors which can be broadly classified as:

(a) Internal factors

(b) External factors

(c) General factors

(a) Internal factors:

Cost of Capital: The process of raising the funds involves some cost. While planning the capital structure, it should be ensured that the use of the capital should be capable of earning the revenue enough to meet the cost of capital. It should be noted here that the borrowed funds are cheaper than the equity funds so far as the cost of capital is concerned. This is because of two reasons:

(a)        The interest rates (i.e. the form of return on the borrowed capital) are usually less than the dividend rates (i.e. the form of return on the equity capital).

(b)        The interest paid on borrowed capital is an allowable expenditure for income tax purposes while the dividends are the appropriate out of the profits.

Risk Factor: While planning the capital structure, the risk factor consideration inevitably comes into picture. If the company raises the capital by way of borrowed capital, it accepts the risk in two ways. Firstly, the company has to maintain the commitment of payment of the interest as well as the installments of the borrowed capital, at a predecided rate and at a predecided time, irrespective of the fact whether there are profits or losses. Secondly, the borrowed capital is usually the secured capital. If the company fails to meet its contractual obligations, the lenders of the borrowed capital may enforce the sale of assets offered to them as security.

On the other hand, if the company raises the capital by way of equity capital, the risk on the part of the company is minimum. Firstly, as dividend is the appropriation of the profits, if there are no profits, the company may not be paying the dividend for years together, Secondly, the company is not expected to repay the equity capital, unlike borrowed capital, during the lifetime of the company. Thirdly, the company is not required to offer any security or mortgage its assets for raising the funds in the form of equity capital. Read more…

Meaning & Principles of Capital Structure Management (30) Views

Jun 18th
by admin |

Meaning:

Capital structure refers to the mix of sources from which the long term funds required by a business are raised.

Goals / Principles of Capital Structure Management:

For considering the suitable pattern of capital structure, it is necessary to consider certain basic principles which are militant to each other. It is necessary to find a golden mean by giving proper weight age to each of them.

(I) Cost Principle: According to this principle, ideal capital structure should minimize cost financing and maximize earnings per share. Debt capital is a cheaper form of capital due to-two reasons. First, the expectations of returns of debt capital holders are less than those of Equity shareholders. Secondly, interest is a deductible expenditure for tax purposes whereas dividend is an appropriation.

(2) Risk Principle: According to this principle, ideal capital structure should not accept unduly high risk. Debt capital is a risky form of capital, as it involves contractual obligations as to the payment of interest and repayment of principal sum irrespective of profits or losses of the business. If the organization issues large amount of preference shares, out of the earnings of the organization, less amount will be left out for equity shareholders as dividend on preference shares is required to be paid before any dividend is paid to equity shareholders.

Raising the capital through equity shares involves least risk as there is no obligation as to the payment of dividend.

(3) Control Principle: According to this principle, ideal capital structure should keep controlling position of owners intact. As preference shareholders and holders of debt capital carry limited or no voting rights, they hardly disturb the controlling position of residual owners. Issue of equity shares disturbs the controlling position directly as the control of the residual owners is likely to get diluted.

(4) Flexibility Principle: According to this principle, ideal capital structure should be able to cater to additional requirements of funds in future, if any. E.g. if a company has already raised too heavy debt capital, by mortgaging all the assets, it will be difficult for it to get further loans inspite of good market conditions for debt capital and it will have to depend on equity shares only for raising further capital. Moreover, organization should avoid capital on such terms and conditions which limit company’s ability to procure additional funds. E.g., if the company accepts debt capital on the condition that it will not accept further loan capital or dividend on equity shares will not be paid beyond certain limit, then it looses flexibility.

(5) Timing Principle: According to this principle, ideal capital structure should be able to seize market opportunities, should minimize cost of raising funds and obtain substantial savings. Accordingly, during the day of boom and prosperity, company can issue equity shares to get the benefit of investors’ desire to invest and take the risk. During the days of depression, debt capital may be used to raise the capital as the investors are afraid to take any risk.

Exchange Brokers (27) Views

Jun 17th
by admin |

Forex brokers play a very important role in the foreign exchange markets. However the extent to which services of forex brokers are utilized depends on the tradition and practice prevailing at a particular forex market centre. In India dealing is done in interbank market through forex brokers. In India as per FEDAI guidelines the AD’s are free to deal directly among themselves without going through brokers. The forex brokers are not allowed to deal on their own account all over the world and also in India.

How Exchange Brokers Work?

Banks seeking to trade display their bid and offer rates on their respective pages of Reuters screen, but these prices are indicative only. On inquiry from brokers they quote firm prices on telephone. In this way, the brokers can locate the most competitive buying and selling prices, and these prices are immediately broadcast to a large number of banks by means of hotlines/loudspeakers in the banks dealing room/contacts many dealing banks through calling assistants employed by the broking firm. If any bank wants to respond to these prices thus made available, the counter party bank does this by clinching the deal. Brokers do not disclose counter party bank’s name until the buying and selling banks have concluded the deal. Once the deal is struck the broker exchange the names of the bank who has bought and who has sold. The brokers charge commission for the services rendered.

In India broker’s commission is fixed by FEDAI.


Links

Articles

Projects